The vulnerabilities of the oppressor

First on the list of activities required to protect oneself from the oppressive methods of control, is to think on a macro level. The main purpose of targeting individuals with electronic harassment, gas lighting and gangstalking is to make them feel victimised. The whole point is to make them feel as if they have no recourse, no protection and must simply submit to the will of their attackers. Not only that , but they must also keep quiet about it because it's all very hush hush and incredibly important work for the government, police, military etc etc. Not only is not very important, but it's certainly no secret. Literally hundreds of millions of people are absolutely aware of the gargantuan scam being rolled out across the entire planet. The problem is that most of them have been turned into avaricious and deceitful cowards. They have accepted the doctrine of their oppressor and they do not have the fortitude to resist. 

In defence of these cognitively dissonant lackeys, many of them have been targeted with extremely aggressive mind control methods. The  philosophy of the aggressors can be readily seen in the 1949 publication '1984' by Eric Arthur Blair (AKA George Orwell). The reference to Room 101 is an analogy which essentially explains how mind control is effectively delivered by establishing what the target fears the most. This fear is then ruthlessly exploited until the target will comply with absolutely anything, purely to avoid the application of yet more fear. To make matter worse many of these targets have had their fears forced on them by malicious and deliberate means. For a great many clandestine informants and operatives this has been achieved through the use of trauma based methods. Many of them have been targeted during formative years with utterly reprehensible acts which have damaged their ability to develop rational coping mechanisms. Instead, the oppressive machine forces them into routines of behaviour which distract and confuse, thereby preventing them from repairing the damage. The pragmatic option of counselling and therapy based recovery is actively discouraged.

One of the first things a therapist will tackle is the residual guilt or shame that any victim is carrying. As such it is the very last thing that an oppressor wants to happen. The guilt complex facilitates the primary control method and is therefore considered as representing the greatest value. The last thing a so called 'handler' or 'controller' wants is the informant or operative dealing with their demons. Instead they encourage them to engage with the same methods that have been used against them, in order to control others. Their attempts are rewarded with various reductions in harassment or possibly even minor material benefits. This reprograms their concepts of social interaction and the oppressive machine scores another point in it's drive to control the entire population through the application of a malevolent pyramid scheme.

The upper levels of this pyramid scheme are actually invoicing the taxpayer for their own time and potentially the time of their operatives. The operatives will generally receive nothing or very little of the financial gains which are intercepted by the handlers of their handlers. So on the chain continues with each strata being encouraged to give up yet more of their time - and also their conscientious belief structure. This enforced erosion of individuality and social affirmation is emphatically reinforced. The oppressive machine will expend unlimited resources in order to maintain it's control over it''s human components or in industry jargon, HUM-INT resources. The entire concept of acquiring useful intelligence becomes less than an afterthought. Instead the vast majority of the man-hours expended are purely orientated toward maintaining control. It is at this point that the greater agenda is illuminated. If everyone is occupied with some act of anti social behaviour, then they're not observing the oppressive machine. If they're not taking a macro view of the oppressive methodology, then they continue to ignore what's happening to their friends, family, community and society in general. 

With the structure and goals identified, let us now focus on the vulnerabilities of this most insidious sociological malfeasance.  Straight away there is the existence of a financial structure. From a strategic standpoint, attacking the economic base of your enemy is traditionally considered one of the most effective means of countering their offensive. In this case, it's not a matter of carpet bombing their factories but more about exposing the ruthless pillaging of the public purse. Given that the entire purpose lacks any actual credibility, the majority of the justification is based on fabricated and loosely implied threats to societal well-being. The creation of bogus 'persons of interest' forms a major part of the so called 'work' conducted by these proponents of deception. Therefore any billing is more often than not, highly fraudulent in nature. This is quite clearly corruption being perpetrated and facilitated on a massive scale. The numerous so called 'investigative' departments of government, police and the military are in receipt of public funds to pay their salaries and also pay for information received from their informants and operatives. Evidence indicates that the majority of payments to informants stopped decades ago. Some is referenced by the police in their annual budgets but this is probably mostly window dressing. Instead the majority are given some minor concession to earn money illegally in the interests of gathering intelligence. The actual instances of credibly useful information being acquired are so few and far between that the majority of the billing is based on total and utter lies. Given that these are public funded organisations, they do have a responsibility to provide justification for their funding. In no way can this justification be demonstrably credible, consequently those signing off on it are an integral part of the corruption. They inhabit an environment of falsehood, imaginary threats and utterly spurious justification. 

The public do have mechanisms whereby they can hold these organisations to account. Unfortunately the mechanisms themselves have been infiltrated and co-opted to the point that they represent mere window dressing. However this superficial veneer of checks and balances is geared toward denying the individual, not the collective. Several organisations have brought pressure to bear on these so called 'investigative' departments in the past and therefore could do so again in the future. Ultimately these 'investigative' departments are operating in an area controlled by the civil service. Without access to public funds and resources their ring-fenced external activities will cease to exist in any meaningful way. This is why perceiving the problem beyond the self is critically important.

There are many instances of targeted individuals openly detailing the mechanism of oppression. Many have been employees of the state and many others have been educated to a high level. Thanks to the accessibility of online resources, anyone can now find others who have been targeted by the state and it's pyramid oppression scheme.  Conducting a search for 'Electronic Harassment' or 'Targeted Individuals' will produce results which show just how many people have been affected by this out of control state oppression. The TEFLONRABBIT.COM reference page for the subject of 'Mind Control' features links to many such individuals and also several groups which seek to spread awareness of this major societal problem. The international scope of the problem is revealed by their global locations. In several cases, those posting information openly admit that they are under 24/7 surveillance and consequently they are unwilling to meet other targeted individuals in person. This is a critical facet of the control mechanism and many will be considered by their 'handlers' to represent something resembling controlled opposition. However, their unfaltering transparency is actually a powerful weapon with which to combat the perpetuation of this malevolence. 

In every conceivable way, the attitude of the oppressive machine resembles that of an abusive institutional relationship. The oppressors insist on secrecy whilst simultaneously competing for dominance. The goal is to have the target ignore the requirements of all other oppressors and submit only to the whims and petulant demands of the individual or organisation pursuing them. This is considered as an occupation for those who have already submitted to these forces and they will do absolutely anything to protect their ability to perpetuate it. When tackling abuse, the conventional attitude is to speak out. Every government in the world has conducted campaigns of anti abuse awareness and they all promote a single easily understood concept:

^{Tell someone either in authority or that can be trusted and do not protect the secrecy}

It is somewhat ironic that these very same governments have also become utterly negligent in their duty of care for millions of targeted individuals. Nonetheless the concept is still valid. There are numerous secret societies involved in the contemporary clandestine world. Many of them claim that betraying their secrets will incur penalties. However their greed has become so prevalent that they no longer limit their activities to those who have knowingly signed up to join their societies. Furthermore they have engaged in widespread conscription methods equating to the press gangs of 18th century Europe. This means that they have no basis whatsoever for their insistence on the secrecy of their malevolent actions. They have blatantly abandoned the rules of their own secret societies. Consequently, they have made themselves highly vulnerable to exposure.

The global psyop known as the Corona Virus / SARS-COV2 pandemic was a massive drive to facilitate all manner of gravy train intelligence activity. It also ensured that anyone speaking out about being targeted could be marginalised and isolated, thereby making it far easier to control and manipulate them. However this process has been going on in it's current form for decades. Beyond that there is substantial evidence documented in several TEFLONRABBIT.COM articles which indicate that it has actually being going on for centuries if not millennia. The gradual erosion of societies fundamental tenets appears by all meters to be a deliberate act pursued by highly malevolent forces. Much of it can be traced back to events in antiquity which erased vast tranches of humanities history. Again, this has actually created a vulnerability. It is no great whistle blowing action to say that the Library of Alexandria was deliberately burned to the ground. The information exists in the public domain and is not covered by any secrecy legislation. Likewise it is no great secret that the Covid pandemic created an entire generation of children who have been the victims of a language deprivation incident. These are not secrets and talking about them is not against any laws. Furthermore, spreading awareness of the possible motivators is paramount if such events are to be prevented in future. 

Whether it was the Caesarian dynasty that razed the library of Alexandria, Christian zealots or Arab invaders the main thing is that it was done for a single reason. Preventing conscientious  objectors from being able to cite their complaints with historical data is the purview of revisionist dictators. Such acts have occurred regularly throughout history and all were conducted for the exact same reason. Those that wish to control people seek to control information. Consequently refusing to keep the secrets of totalitarian oppression is the single greatest tool with which to combat it's rise. This does require a conscientious attitude however. Those who 'go along to get along' are beyond useless in this regard. They're far too easily manipulated by their desire to secure their comfort zone. In this way they can only be considered a liability.

Giving up work and remaining isolated in the home due to a heinously illogical attack on virology science is not comfortable. This represents an attempt by world governments to alter their populations concept of what actually constitutes a comfort zone. In a nutshell, they want their populations to go along (with even more) to get along (with even less) than before. At which point we see that this requirement fits with the institutionalised abuse behaviour detailed earlier. The real and undisclosed purposes of the isolation are then monetised in numerous ways by the frankly insane investigative departments mentioned previously. Part of the motivation behind the creation of the Covid delayed was a protectionist initiative. An inter generational method of social engineering to ensure a compliant population who will have profound difficulties developing trust mechanisms. They will accept the mainstream narrative and betray anyone they are told to in order to protect their relationship with their abusive institution. Ironically these developmentally challenged individuals will  promote the attitude that anyone who challenges the mainstream narrative must be mentally ill in some way. This has been conducted among non developmentally challenged individuals for decades.

According to the narrative enforcement efforts of most NATO countries, questioning the 'War on Terror' is tantamount to defiling the graves of heroic service personnel. In the same way questioning the quarantining of the healthy during 2019 - 2022 is considered the actions of demonised 'Anti Vaxxers'. This is nothing new and has only become contentious as a result of a more educated global population. This education is part of the solution for targeted individuals. Those who remain uninformed are at risk of appearing to be insane and forced onto medication or even institutionalised. To rant and rave about your neighbour listening in on your thoughts and banging on their bins whenever you think about the war on terror, sounds crazy. However stating dispassionately that you suspect excessive targeting by an investigative department of the civil service (or federal government) who rely on SIG-INT, MAS-INT and ELF-INT sounds a lot less deranged. Educating yourself with the work of neurology researchers in regards to microwave based directed energy weapons and the application of frequencies detailed in the Dosimetry handbook achieves an even greater effect. Also explaining that you are considering an independent complaints procedure in regards to the unethical usage of HSS sound targeting comes across a lot better than awkward and disjointed claims of 'voices in your head'.

Ultimately these organisations only fear accountability and embarrassment among their peers arising from exposure of their methods. To consider their operations a success they must leave their target with no recourse other than to keep quiet and put up with it. If their target starts posting erudite content online using industry defined terminology, they won't like it and probably throw a few hissy fits. Nonetheless there isn't actually much they can do about it other than use more gangstalking and more gaslighting. It is at this point that the individual has turned the balance of power in their favour. If more people educate themselves, there will be less opportunity for these organisations to prevail.  As a result the concept of 'controlled opposition' is actually bit of a trope. With every instance of increased awareness, the chances of operational success are correspondingly reduced. In the words of Preston Nichols:

^{Once the mind is aware of these methods, it can create ways to protect itself.}